Home
heef [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
heef

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

CPA? [Nov. 16th, 2009|12:29 am]
Anyone know of a good-yet-at-least-moderately-affordable CPA in Massachusetts? I need a hand knowing the ramifications of self-incorporation and how to do business filings and payroll, and if they're good, I'll retain them for an hour or two a month going forward.
linkpost comment

Desperation [Oct. 6th, 2009|04:08 am]
What marks Obama's desperation for a "win" other than his attempt at the Olympic proceedings?
linkpost comment

Dude. [Sep. 28th, 2009|05:06 pm]
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/news/story?id=4510742

and

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6228477/UN-leaders-back-nuclear-resolution-but-grow-impatient-with-Iran.html

Mr. President: THIS is what you spend your time on? Dammit, DO SOMETHING USEFUL. Ugh. /vomit

Our President sucks right now. Sorry, but he does. He gets nothing done, kowtows to despots, and demonstrates an utter lack of spine. He resorts to apologetics for our past misdeeds, yet never notices that we spend more on foreign aid than every other country in the world, combined. He bends over and grabs his ankles to appease dictatorships. Witness: Hugo Chavez and Moammar Qaddafi praise him, and Sarkozy and Brown verbally slap him. He's done precisely nothing domestically, save for continuing deeply unpopular Bush policies (some of which make sense, despite the ravings of the maniacal left, and some of which do not.)

Iran is going to have a bomb in the next few years unless Obama does something unexpected (or Israel decides that we're spineless enough to be effectively useless and thus takes independent action.) Do you think that, in the face of precisely *zero* outside efforts to overthrow their regime, that their nuclear weapon will be anything but offensive in intent? Do you seriously think that they need a 3,000 chamber cascade to enrich Uranium to anything but bomb capacity? How naive is the American electorate? (Note to self: Prepare for painful reply.)

Thanks for voting this guy in. He's doing exactly what I expected, and nobody anywhere should be proud of that. McCain's policies weren't particularly better, but at least it seems that he'd have executed some of them with at least a modicum of vertebral integrity, which right now seems like a massive upgrade.
linkpost comment

Dumb pun of the day. [Jul. 14th, 2009|06:53 am]
If Senators voting to seat her are casting "Sotomayor-yeas", would the votes not to seat her be "Soto-mayonays?"
link2 comments|post comment

Online store site [Jul. 4th, 2009|07:11 pm]
I'm looking to set up a small online store, hosted by someone else so I don't have to set up any of the payment stuff. I just want to be able to set prices, upload images of the products, and sell stuff. Any suggestions?
link3 comments|post comment

Mathematicians rule. [Jun. 20th, 2009|03:45 pm]
On the evidence that the Iran vote was rigged:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/20/AR2009062000004.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
link4 comments|post comment

Racism in justice [May. 27th, 2009|05:32 am]
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/26/AR2009052602846.html?hpid=opinionsbox1:

Judge Sotomayor has spoken about how gender, ethnicity and race influence a judge's views, and that should be one subject for her confirmation hearings. In a 2001 speech, she said: "The aspiration to impartiality is just that -- it's an aspiration because it denies the fact that we are by our experiences making different choices than others. . . . Justice [Sandra Day] O'Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases . . . . I am not so sure that I agree with the statement. First, . . . there can never be a universal definition of wise. Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

First: Hypocrisy much? You deride a universal definition of wisdom, then rely upon it in your subsequent sentence.

Second: Yay racism and sexism. Go go go.

She may be qualified and bright, but that statement is pathetic and disturbing. Cue the apologists.
link16 comments|post comment

Nothing new under the sun [Mar. 4th, 2009|10:14 am]
No we can't!
link7 comments|post comment

John Maiar? [Feb. 26th, 2009|03:23 am]
"John Locke. Yes, that's what they used to call me... John Locke the Grey.

I am John Locke the White, and I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide."
link2 comments|post comment

Sorry, no. [Jan. 20th, 2009|05:17 pm]
America is *not* a friend of each nation. We can be, under different and varying circumstances, but we surely *are* not.
link24 comments|post comment

Whoa [Jan. 20th, 2009|12:10 pm]
How did those guys sneak a howitzer past security? This is no good.
link3 comments|post comment

Inauguration side question [Jan. 20th, 2009|11:57 am]
Who are you and what have you done with the real Aretha Franklin??
link6 comments|post comment

Still true... [Jan. 13th, 2009|02:00 am]
Chloe O'Brian is the best character on television.
linkpost comment

Cooking [Dec. 10th, 2008|07:28 pm]
Two of the biggest holes in my cooking, in my opinion, are sauces, and the handful of basic dishes that I've just never made (and thus can not vary experimentally).

Well, the other day I made my first risotto. Buttery goodness with chicken stock and prosciutto and parsley. Pretty good stuff, though if I experiment on it too often, I'll see you all at 300 lbs.
linkpost comment

LOSTing it up [Dec. 10th, 2008|07:23 pm]
So my Lost season 4 DVDs showed up yesterday. Now I'm in one of my marathon viewings - S1-S3 in under 5 days (I often play it in the background while I'm working). Currently 4 episodes away from the awesomeness of Desmond, albeit accompanied by 18ish episodes of what I like to call "Ana Lucia Hell" - it's just one of those difficult things that you have to suffer through for the greater good.

So, while I'm having fun here watching mah favorite show... I guess I'll just open the floor to any LOST-related discussions. Who's your favorite actor on the show? Favorite character? Biggest plot hole? Theory for S5?
link5 comments|post comment

Excellence in advertising [Dec. 7th, 2008|11:20 am]
Greg Oden's ESPN commercial:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXbpB-rlung

This just cracks me up every time I see it. The advertisements are fantastic, and clearly Oden has a self-effacing sense of humor.
link1 comment|post comment

On Gardasil [Nov. 26th, 2008|09:29 pm]
Gardasil is the vaccine that protects against HPV. It's recommended for women who are still growing, in order to protect them against a common form of cervical cancer that is very highly correlated with (and thus believed to cause, backed by a mountain of scientific evidence) this form of cancer. While there are some folks who will not have it administered to their children out of fear that it will somehow make them more likely to have sex (sigh, PLEASE), it is, for the most part, gaining widespread acceptance.

Here's my question: assuming that most women who have HPV contract it from heterosexual sex, why exactly is this only being administered to women? Unless there's something it does harmful to men (only) that I'm not aware of, it should be recommended for everyone, so that you're doing battle on both fronts. Assume it protects 99.9% of people from catching the virus. If 50% of men are carrying it, and it has a perfect transmission rate, then 1 sexually active woman in 2,000 will catch it. (All figures are guesses, but they're only to prove a point-at-large.) If the vaccine is effective in men as well, then only 1 in 2,000 men will have it (in the long run) and thus 1 woman in 4,000,000 will contract it.

Even if the numbers are off by a couple orders of magnitude, the point stands. Vaccinating men *and* women is the right play, long term, and could possibly eventually result (unless the vaccine is far less effective than I think) in a smallpox-like eradication, unless the virus has a substantial nonhuman transmission vector.
link4 comments|post comment

Sundry thoughts on TV [Nov. 24th, 2008|11:15 pm]
* Heroes is, right now, the record holder for "show that was pretty good once and is now nigh unwatchable". My friend Katie and I chat online every week, as it's playing, about how terrible the plots, lines, characters... even acting, at this point... are. It's suitable only for MST3k-ing, having now jumped every living species of shark.

* I don't miss "Saved by zeeeero" commercials a bit.

* I cannot wait for Lost to return. January is too far off.

* Craig Ferguson is the second best late night talk show host on TV. He's hilarious.

* The commercials for The Starter Wife really reduce my enjoyment of the neverending supply of House on USA network. I'm getting to the point where I actually do *not* want candy, and it's because of those awful commercials. That show looks awful. Tip for TV execs: when you put the funniest one-liners in your commercials, and they're not funny at all, your show probably sucks.

* Monday Night Football is at least tolerable now, as is SportsCenter. They've toned down the idiocy.

* House may or may not be running out of ideas... I just haven't figured out which yet.
link5 comments|post comment

Reporting the important news [Nov. 7th, 2008|04:20 pm]
One thing I very much wish right now is that the major newspapers, television networks, etc. would stop reporting the daily swings of the DJIA as major news. The Dow is going to be swinging wildly for some time, and what really matters are the stories that cause the long-term trends, the solution to (or continuing difficulty of) the credit crisis, unemployment, global market trends, etc.

It's not just a matter of my personal annoyance... I think that the daily movement of the Dow is causing people more distress than it should right now. That sort of thing is important to day traders and mutual/hedge fund managers, bond traders... but not the people who get their news from CNN, not people who are retiring anything over a year from now, and not the corporations and banks who are making investments on month-and-year-long trends.
link6 comments|post comment

New proposal for American elections [Nov. 6th, 2008|10:09 am]
Early decision.

You win more than 60% of the popular vote, you get to start immediately. But if you applied for it, it'd be binding, so you wouldn't be allowed to run for president of any other country at the same time.
link4 comments|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement